All Publications

Delhi's EV Policy

Delhi made a whopping ₹3,954 crore mandate on EVs. The capital might just be trading one massive crisis for another.

Published 4 min readUpdated By John Doe

Delhi consumed 239.63 million units of electricity at public electric vehicle charging stations.

The capital has successfully transitioned to the nation's most active EV charging hub.

Yet beneath this headline energy consumption, a different governance reality is emerging.

Importance

Vehicular emissions contribute approximately 23% of Delhi's winter air pollution (DriveSpark, 2026). According to the World Health Organisation, the city's average annual fine particulate matter exposure regularly exceeds recommended safe thresholds (Law.asia, 2026).

Decarbonising transport is not merely an environmental goal. It is an urgent public health imperative.

With two-wheelers constituting 67% of Delhi's active vehicle population, the design of the state's transition strategy will directly shape the city's environment for decades (Hindustan Times, 2026).

img1
img1

Background

The original Delhi Electric Vehicle Policy of 2020 expired in August 2023 following multiple administrative extensions (Hindustan Times, 2026). That initial framework targeted a 25% share of electric vehicles in new registrations by 2024 (IRADe, 2019).

However, the state fell short of its ambitions. It reached an estimated market penetration of 13% to 14% by early 2026 (Hindustan Times, 2026).

To bridge this gap, the government approved the Delhi Electric Vehicle Policy 2026 on June 29, 2026 (Rediff, 2026). Valid until March 31, 2030, this new framework marks a fundamental policy reform, shifting from soft subsidies to hard mandates (Law.asia, 2026).

It allocates Rs 3,954.25 crore to drive systematic fleet transitions across the capital (The Hindu, 2026).

Policy Components

Policy ComponentBudget Allocation
Purchase SubsidiesRs 1,236.25 Crore
Scrapping IncentivesRs 1,718.00 Crore
Charging InfrastructureRs 1,000.00 Crore
TotalRs 3,954.25 Crore

img2
img2

What the Data Shows

While Uttar Pradesh leads India in absolute registered electric vehicles with 15.2 lakh units, Delhi focuses heavily on high-utilisation commercial fleets (ET Auto, 2026). Out of India's 80 lakh registered electric vehicles, Delhi accounts for approximately 4.8 lakh (ET Auto, 2026).

Total electric vehicle registrations in Delhi grew from 83,512 in the 2024–2025 financial year to 1.07 lakh in 2025–2026 (ET Auto, 2026).

However, a closer institutional analysis of the two-wheeler segment reveals a massive implementation challenge. During the past two financial years, over one million two-wheelers were registered in Delhi (Hindustan Times, 2026). Only 68,275 of these were electric, representing a modest 6.75% adoption rate (Hindustan Times, 2026).

To push these numbers upward, EV Policy 2.0 introduces aggressive regulatory cut-offs (Drishti IAS, 2026).

  • From January 1, 2027, only electric three-wheelers and N1 commercial trucks can be registered in Delhi (Drishti IAS, 2026).
  • From April 1, 2028, new registrations of petrol and CNG-powered two-wheelers will be completely discontinued (EV Infrastructure News, 2026).

Policy Perspectives

Perspective A: The Supporting View

Supporters of the regulation argue that hard mandates are essential to break the status quo and address chronic air pollution.

The policy provides robust upfront purchase subsidies to cushion early economic transitions. Electric two-wheeler buyers receive Rs 10,000 per kWh up to Rs 30,000 in Year 1, alongside a 100% waiver of road taxes for vehicles priced under Rs 30 lakh (DriveSpark, 2026).

Linking these incentives to the scrapping of older BS-IV vehicles prevents the simple addition of new vehicles to an already congested road network (EV Infrastructure News, 2026).

Perspective B: The Critical View

Critics argue that the policy's aggressive timelines place an unfair financial burden on lower-income commercial operators (Drishti IAS, 2026). Mandating a shift for auto-rickshaw drivers and delivery workers could cause severe financial stress without accessible vehicle financing (Insights IAS, 2026).

Infrastructure gaps also remain a critical governance challenge. The city aims to expand from 10,000 public chargers to 32,000 by 2030 (The Tribune, 2026). However, existing installations are highly uneven (EPW, 2026).

img3
img3

Global Comparison

Oslo, Norway, offers a valuable benchmark for structural mobility transitions.

In December 2025, battery electric vehicles captured 97.6% of all new passenger car sales in Norway (OFV, 2026). For the full year of 2025, the market share stood at 95.9% (OECD, 2026).

Norway achieved this through a progressive polluter-pays tax system, weight-based registration duties, and a long-standing exemption on value-added tax for electric vehicles (WCShipping, 2025).

However, Oslo's model relies on unique systemic advantages. Norway's grid is powered by 95% renewable hydroelectric energy, meaning its transition is genuinely zero-emission (WCShipping, 2025).

In contrast, Delhi relies heavily on coal-fired thermal power. This means the city is currently shifting emissions from urban tailpipes to regional power generation hubs (Indian Express, 2026).

Policy Questions Going Forward

As Delhi implements its most ambitious transport reform, several critical policy questions remain unresolved.

1. Grid Capacity

Can the local distribution grid absorb the projected 375 MW charging load without compromising residential supply reliability (Hindustan Times, 2026)?

2. Equitable Financing

How will the state ensure equitable access to institutional vehicle financing for lower-income commercial drivers facing the 2027 and 2028 registration bans (Drishti IAS, 2026)?

3. Workforce Transition

What transition support will be provided to informal automotive mechanics facing sudden structural displacement (EPW, 2026)?

4. Battery Recycling

And finally, will the state's battery recycling framework successfully intercept hazardous waste streams before they enter the informal scrap sector (India Today, 2026)?

More reading

31 Aug 2026

The Boy Who Cried 'AI': Why Instagram Flags Real Videos as AI (and Lets the Real Deepfakes Slip By)

A conscious digital society begins with understanding what we scroll past. This article explores the invisible mechanisms behind Instagram’s ‘AI info’ labels, revealing how blunt regulatory compliance often flags authentic creator content while letting genuine deepfakes slip through. It highlights the critical gap between global technology regulation, from the EU AI Act to India's recent IT Rules amendments, and everyday digital reality. Read the full piece to unlock insights on content provenance, metadata, and the hidden costs of algorithmic labeling.

22 Aug 2026

GST in India: Transforming Taxation and Shaping the Economy

The Public Policy Club, Rishihood University is proud to present our latest analysis, examining the transformative impact of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. Launched in 2017, GST marked a historic shift toward “One Nation, One Tax,” aiming to unify India’s fragmented indirect tax system. But has this ambitious reform truly streamlined taxation, boosted economic growth, and simplified compliance for businesses? This article delves into the successes, challenges, and ongoing adjustments of GST, exploring how it has reshaped commerce, government revenue, and the broader economy. We unpack the benefits, the unintended consequences, and the road ahead in India’s evolving tax landscape. Read our full analysis here:

22 Aug 2026

Liberalisation’s Long Shadow: Why India Still Struggles to Become a Developed Nation

The Public Policy Club, Rishihood University presents an analysis of India’s 1991 Liberalisation, Privatisation, and Globalisation (LPG) reforms. Amid a severe balance-of-payments crisis and decades of industrial stagnation, India took bold steps to liberalise its economy, privatise state enterprises, and integrate with global markets. This article examines how these reforms rescued the economy, spurred GDP growth, and created a burgeoning services sector, while also highlighting the unfinished agenda of manufacturing, employment, and inclusive development.